Wednesday, November 11, 2015

The Spy movie you should see VS. The Spy movie you will see


vs. 


We are on the brink of a major motion picture extravaganza. In just a little over a week from now the final installment of the Hunger Games franchise will be released followed shortly thereafter by the first Star Wars film in over a decade. I’m not here to talk about any of that yet. We have a short window of dead space between now and then where you may find yourself at the movie theater deciding what to watch. I’m here to help you make that decision.

Chances are you will end up seeing a spy movie. I know that because there are only two new films at the box office worth seeing (not counting Matt Damon in Space) and they both revolve around espionage. You’ve probably heard that James Bond is back in his newest film ‘Spectre.’ You may not have heard that Tom Hanks is running around lawyering the hell out of the Soviets in the film ‘Bridge of Spies.’ Speaking as a millennial, I believe that younger people will gravitate towards the former and not the latter. Huge mistake! “Big deal” you might say. “Sounds relatively inconsequential” you might say. “Still enjoyed the Bond film” you might say even after you realize YOU BLEW IT once you finish this post. Wrong-o. Indulge me.

Generation Y people have grown up with total national security. I would argue that September 11th even deepened our belief that this nation will be made safer at all costs. We truly have never feared being attacked by another global power. We can’t even comprehend what that type of fear feels or looks like. Generation X lived during the Cold War. They learned to fear the danger of nuclear war and tried to grasp the threat of another global superpower, Soviet Russia, usurping the United States. Communism was an ideology that swept over Eastern Europe and changed the entire international climate for better and, often times, for worse. Speaking for Gen Y, as people who weren’t alive during that time how can we possibly understand what that was like? The answer is film! Specifically a new film titled ‘Bridge of Spies’ starring Tom Hanks. Because this blog is titled ‘No Spoilers’ I’m not going to dig into the plot here. I just want to appeal to the reader to consider seeing an incredibly intriguing, slower film that is sure to broaden your horizons as opposed to an entertaining, cookie-cutter, action film (Spectre) that is sure to make you appreciate Daniel Craig’s fashion sense. The story telling in ‘Bridge of Spies’ is top notch and it will not only give you some understanding of a past generation, but it will help you empathize with the dangerous international climate that still exists in other countries today. The situations in Syria, Iraq, and the heightened Israel/Palestine conflict all feel more ‘real’ after seeing this film. People abroad are still living in this state of fear and imminent threat. We shouldn’t do our best to avoid understanding real conflict, historical or current, because it seems like a slower story.


Don’t get me wrong, James Bond is fun. But going to see a film can be used as an opportunity to change the way you think about real life. Movies as a medium can be incredibly educational and eye-opening, though we must take special care to acknowledge inherent bias. ‘Bridge of Spies’ is an American movie opening in America so you can expect the Soviet Russians to be demonized a bit. Regardless, the film will have you thinking about international diplomatic relations in a way you probably haven’t thought about before. This is in large part a result of some truly great & honest acting from the entire cast - most notably Tom Hanks. If you find yourself at the theater I implore you to take the opportunity to absorb a worthwhile message. But hey, James Bond is guaranteed to blow shit up by shooting a gas tank so whatever floats your boat. 




Wednesday, May 6, 2015

Avengers: Age of Ultron



Down & dirty: The second superhero reunion is a hollow joyride - fun and disposable.
Director: Joss Whedon
Big Names: Seriously everyone...RDJ, Chris Evans, Mark Ruffalo, Chris Hemsworth, ScarJo, Jeremy Renner, James Spader, Samuel L. Jackson, Don Cheadle, the cast of Pitch Perfect, my dog, Obama, just everyone ever.


Do you remember eating Dunkaroos back when you were a kid? I recognize this reference panders to 90’s babies but bear with me. Dunkaroos were great. Endearing kangaroo mascot, chocolate cookies with a little bucket of vanilla frosting you could dip them in! What’s better than that? The problem was that there were about four tiny cookies per pack. It just wasn't satisfying…even as an 8 year old. Eventually people caught on and realized they were an overpriced, unfulfilling sugar bomb.

That’s Avengers: Age of Ultron. Four chocolate cookies with delicious vanilla frosting and a feeling of ‘but I wanted more!’ upon its completion. Every single person I've spoken to has said they enjoyed this film. I get it. There is a lot of action, funny moments, recognizable superheroes. It is enjoyable. But it could have been so much more.

Maybe I’m being pretentious – I accept that is entirely possible. But when I say more I don’t mean more explosions, more robots, or more infinity stones (certainly not more infinity stones). I mean more depth. This film has already made more money than the GDP of a small nation so I’m not questioning it’s marketability or its basic entertainment value. I’m talking about humanizing the film: moral code and familial obligation. Let’s take those one at a time.

Morally the film tries to tackle the idea of artificial intelligence and the problems it creates when we get too close to creating life. I guess I was hoping for more ‘Ex Machina’ and less ‘iRobot’. More nuanced arguments and less total destruction. It felt like ground that had been tread on so many times before that I already knew exactly how it would end. I won’t spoil it for you but I’d bet my salary that you could guess how the final battle unfolds (See: The Avengers). What if the filmmakers had utilized this massive platform of film distribution to seriously ask a meaningful question like ‘is an intelligent and unemotional machine better suited than us to be judge & jury?’ instead of just showcase said machine as a furiously blind executioner.

In terms of familial obligation I appreciate the effort the filmmakers put into trying to humanize Hawkeye. Guess what? That still fell flat. I’ll give you a tease of a spoiler here: you are introduced to Hawkeye’s family. Implemented as an interesting aside to the major story line, it is completely disposed of when the plot device has served its initial purpose as if to say “Look! Real life! We included it! – Now let’s get back to laying waste to everything.” Again, I’m not asking a superhero movie to be a Shakespearean exploration of human interaction but come on - if you’re going to include real family dynamics at least make it honest.   

Those are my gripes. I accept the title of 'only person who didn't love it'. Again, it was still incredibly well made. It’s worth watching. I just thought they missed an absolutely monstrous opportunity to say something meaningful. I enjoyed the film and I enjoyed Dunkaroos…while they lasted.

Tuesday, January 20, 2015

Boyhood

Down & Dirty: Epic coming of age drama, worth the time investment
Director: Richard Linklater
Big Names: Ethan Hawke, Patricia Arquette


SO PROUD to announce my first guest review........courtesy of my Mom!!!

Take it away Suze...

BOYHOOD is an epic drama tracing the life of a boy and his family as he grows up from age 6 to age 18. The film takes viewers seamlessly through the years with scenes from young Mason’s life, evoking nostalgia, warmth, and sadness. Strong characters Mom, Dad, and Mason develop incrementally along the way—flawed, yet genuine and sympathetic. Viewers will identify with different characters in particular scenes. In one especially poignant moment, Mom (played by Patricia Arquette) breaks down as Mason is about to leave for college, crying out “You are so happy!” capturing the gulf between the rocky emotions of the soon to be empty-nest parent and the eager-to-leave home adolescent.

                It is impossible to watch this movie without looking forward, backward and inward at one’s own life. The film, through character studies, explores the themes of human resiliency and redemption, questioning “what’s the point?” from the perspectives of Mom, Dad, and son. Without directly answering the question, later scenes allude to a spiritual aspect in the father’s life revealing how he has matured emotionally, vocationally, and spiritually. The film compels the viewer’s respect for Mom’s survival instinct and tenaciousness. Meanwhile, Mason’s teenage sloth behavior morphs into philosophical exploration; later into more mature reflection and signs of an emerging work ethic.  All three main characters explore the question of timing in relationships with the benefit of doing a “fly over” of their lives over the last dozen years.


                As a person who is very picky about watching 3-hour movies, I am glad I did not know the length before watching the film. It was well worth the time.

-Suzanne Keating 

Thursday, January 15, 2015

The Best Film of 2014



The Imitation Game

Down & Dirty: The best film of 2014

Director: Morten Tyldum

Big Names: Benedict Cumberbatch, Keira Knightley

Occasionally a film will come around that does a little bit of everything perfectly. Solid amount of drama. Tiny dose of comedy. Good bit of intrigue. Snippets of romance. These elements are interwoven seamlessly to create a flush montage – a well told story. Of course none of this is possible without a good premise. And where do the best premises come from? True stories. Drama rooted in reality.
The Imitation Game does what Unbroken could not do. It takes a true story and makes it so powerful, so urgent and personal that it commands your full emotional attention. Angelina Jolie’s film focused on human triumph in the face of unfathomable adversity. But in that movie the viewer only knows Louie in the context of several mostly horrific situations. It doesn’t feel real until you walk out of the theater and remind yourself, “Wow that legitimately did happen.” The Imitation Game suffers no such delayed empathy. This is the tale of Alan Turing, an Einstein-like genius who accelerated World War II about five years in the Allies favor. How? He cracked the unbreakable Nazi communication code known as Enigma using the earliest computer engineering. To tell you the machinations through which he did it and the opposition he faced throughout the process would be to rob you of a most fulfilling cinematic experience. But I will give a shameless sales pitch on why it is worth watching.
The penmanship of the script can and should be appreciated by all. A World War II political thriller revolving around the life of a mathematician is such a mundane premise to history-handicapped millenials, but the dialogue is sharp enough to stay relevant. Cumberbatch’s Sherlock-like demeanor captivates the viewer right off the bat. Don’t know about WWII? Don’t sweat it. The film does a phenomenal job of informing the viewer without condescending, unlike the character of Alan Turing.
Turing can truly be a prick. His abrasive nature is seemingly the social deficiency manifested in his genius. I’ve never seen an actor so completely embrace this stigma of genius. Cumberbatch is believable in every moment of bewilderment at his own unpleasantness. The ticks, the arrogant looks, and the obsessive behavior - it’s all beautifully portrayed in Cumberbatch’s committed performance. The Oscar nomination for Best Actor is fully deserved. As is the film’s overall nomination for Best Picture.
(SPOILER AHEAD)
I will spoil one bit for you because it deserves talking about: Alan Turing was gay. You might be asking yourself why you haven’t heard of Alan Turing before. The answer is shocking, unfortunate, and straight-forward.
England buried him. Both figuratively and literally.
His country failed to recognize him for his accomplishments (War-time and otherwise) until one year ago due to the fact that they persecuted him for his sexuality back in the 1950’s. He was forced to undergo hormonal treatment which eventually drove him to suicide. Take that in. It took until one year ago to recognize this man’s accomplishments because he was attracted to the same sex. Just remember that we as a society have the capacity for extraordinarily inhumane treatment and we often still refuse to own up to those mistakes in retrospect. Forgiveness is consigned to oblivion.
During the Oscar campaign, the film’s promoters really pushed the angle of The Imitation Game being a platform for the rights of homosexuals and the historical persecution homosexuals have faced. Rightfully so – but it would be a shame to pigeon hole this film as a socio-political rallying point.  It’s so much more than that. The entire filmmaking process blends together to create an unforgettable cinematic experience. Movies like The Imitation Game only come around once in a while. Don’t miss it.